A Reconstructed Indigenous Religious Tradition in Latvia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3372677 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anita Stasulane (0000-0002-9971-6257, Daugavpils University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 195 |
| Publication date | 2019-03-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel10030195 |
| OpenAlex | W2921145237 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 13 |
In the early 20th century, Dievturība, a reconstructed form of paganism, laid claim to the status of an indigenous religious tradition in Latvia. Having experienced various changes over the course of the century, Dievturība has not disappeared from the Latvian cultural space and gained new manifestations with an increase in attempts to strengthen indigenous identity as a result of the pressures of globalization. This article provides a historical analytical overview about the conditions that have determined the reconstruction of the indigenous Latvian religious tradition in the early 20th century, how its form changed in the late 20th century and the types of new features it has acquired nowadays. The beginnings of the Dievturi movement show how dynamic the relationship has been between indigeneity and nationalism: indigenous, cultural and ethnic roots were put forward as the criteria of authenticity for reconstructed paganism, and they fitted in perfectly with nativist discourse, which is based on the conviction that a nation's ethnic composition must correspond with the state's titular nation. With the weakening of the Soviet regime, attempts emerged amongst folklore groups to revive ancient Latvian traditions, including religious rituals as well. Distancing itself from the folk tradition preservation movement, Dievturība nowadays nonetheless strives to identify itself as a Latvian lifestyle movement and emphasizes that it represents an ethnic religion which is the people's spiritual foundation and a part of intangible cultural heritage. In the 21st century, Dievturība is characterized by conflicting aspects: on the one hand, a desire is expressed to contrast itself and its ethnic views from globalization tendencies in its activities, but on the other hand New Age concepts and a self-reflexive character has entered its discourse
Aesthetics · Archaeology · Christianity · Ethnic group · Ethnology · Folklore · Indigenous · Islam · Latvian · Nationalism · Paganism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Zoroastrianism · Anthropology · History · Law · Philosophy · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices · Social and Cultural Studies · Soviet and Russian History
Fear and loathing in North Ossetia
Ossetian Ritual Feasts and Transpersonal Experience
Current Challenges to the Protection of (Neo)pagans' Religious Freedom in the Baltic States
Transreligiosity and Religious Revitalization in Modern Greece
Desafiando a hegemonia religiosa
The Nexus of Folk Ornament and Mythology in Latvia
Transformations of Neopaganism in Latvia
The Mythology of Ethnic Identity and the Establishing of Modern Holy Places in Post-Soviet Latvia
The Dievturi Movement in the Reports of the Latvian Political Police (1939–1940)
Representation of Nature Spirits and Gods in Latvian Art in the First Half of the Twentieth Century
Christians! Go home
Is extreme right‐wing populism contagious? Explaining the emergence of a new party family
Pagan places
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |