Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mr. Madison's War and Long-Term Congressional Voting Behavior

Bibliographic Data

ID3374044
AuthorsRudolph M Bell (corresponding author)
Year1979
Volume36
Issue3
Pages373
Publication date1979-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe William and Mary Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0043-5597 • E-ISSN: 1933-7698
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1943382
OpenAlexW2316713233
LanguageEN
Citations received5

N June 4, i8I2, the House of Representatives for the first time voted Q )to declare war upon a foreign nation. The tally was seventy-nine affirmative and forty-nine negative, a comfortable but not overwhelming victory for the Madison administration that only three days earlier had communicated a formal list of grievances to justify this bold step. The roll-call vote on the war and the issues leading to it have been studied at length, some would say ad taedium. Intensive quantitative analysis in recent years proves what was widely understood in i8I2 as well: most Republicans, old and new, voted for war, whereas all Federalists opposed the declaration. No other line of cleavage-geographical, personal, boarding-house fraternity, length of service, or whatever-fits as fully not only with the vote of June 4 but also with roll calls throughout the session.' The narrowly partisan character of legislative behavior in the Twelfth Congress accords well with a related historiographic tradition: that James Madison was a weak executive. The Republican party, this view maintains, compelled Madison to ask for a declaration of war or, more precisely, to present a message stating the justification for this course while stopping just short of explicitly recommending it. Congressional Republicans attempted to preserve their dominant position in electoral politics by rallying their supporters to the only option they claimed was still open short of capitulation to British depredations and an admission that the policies of a decade had failed. For many Republicans, the health and survival of republican government rested on their party's success in the impending national elections. They

Physics · Political science · Politics · Term (time · Voting · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law

  • The Genesis of America

    Jasper M Trautsch•The Genesis of America•2018

  • Congressional and State Legislative Roll-Call Studies by U. S. Historians

    Open Access•Joel H Silbey•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1981

  • Research on 19th Century Legislatures

    Open Access•Margaret Susan Thompson, Joel H Silbey•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1984

  • James Madison and the Militants

    Reginald C Stuart•Diplomatic History•1982

  • Justifying the War of 1812

    Open Access•Ronald L Hatzenbuehler, Robert L Ivie•Social Science History•1980

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,11
Citation span1980 - 2018 (39)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae