Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A New Portrait of a Daoist Sage

Jean-François Foucquet's Interpretation of the Dao

Bibliographic Data

ID3381127
AuthorsSophie Ling-Chia Wei (0000-0002-6959-7939, Chinese University of Hong Kong, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume14
Issue2
Pages263
Publication date2023-02-16
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReligions (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/rel14020263
OpenAlexW4321097503
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited5

In the translation history of late imperial China, the Jesuit enterprise played a significant role in translating Western scientific knowledge, a role they performed in tandem with proselytization. The Jesuit Figurists' re-interpreting and re-writing of the ancient Chinese classics pivoted on symbols, figures, and Chinese characters. The father at the helm of this journey, Joachim Bouvet (1656-1730), embarked on his own Figurist path, navigating by the symbols, figures, and Chinese characters from the Yijing. His followers Joseph Henri Marie de Prémare (1666-1736) and Jean François Foucquet (1665-1741) continued on this track, each further developing his own interpretation of the Dao. Here I will present and explore Foucquet's journey of the Dao and his presentation of the Christian God and Jesus Christ as Daoist sages by investigating his Chinese, French, and Latin manuscripts that discuss his reinterpretation of the Dao in the Chinese classics, especially the Yijing and Daodejing. In these manuscripts, Foucquet adopted typological exegesis and exhibited his inheritance of the Confucian-Christian-Dao synthesis from his senior Bouvet; he also identified the Dao as Deus and the Oneness of the Dao as the unity of the Holy Trinity. This micro-historical case study of Foucquet's interpretation of the Dao shows how his navigating the strait between the Scylla and Charybdis of the emperor and the Holy See factored into his trajectory of interpreting the Dao; it also demonstrates that in response to being challenged by his own brothers in the Catholic Church, he cleaved to typological exegesis and Confucian-Christian-Dao synthesis. The significance of this paper lies in that the early understanding of the Dao was manipulated, especially among the Figurists, both as a tool for proselytization and as a bridge to link the East with the West

Ancient history · Archaeology · Art · Art history · China · Emperor · Exegesis · Portrait · Reinterpretation · Theology · Classics · Historical and Literary Studies · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · Philosophy · Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought

  • Bridging the Ineffable

    Open Access•Xinli Chen, Yanzhe Liu•Religions•2026

  • An 18th-Century Catholic-Daoist Theology

    Open Access•Misha Tadd•Religions•2025

  • History Retold

    Leo Tak-Hung Chan, Zong-Qi Cai•History Retold•2023

  • Cultural Translation in Early Modern Europe

    Open Access•Eva Kowalská, Carlos M N Eire et al.•Cultural Translation in Early…•2007

  • Chinese Theology and Translation

    Sophie Ling-Chia Wei•Chinese Theology and Translation•2019

Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae