Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Brexit biographies

Everyday articulations of race, class and nation through the keyhole issues of Empire and 'culture wars

Bibliographic Data

ID3387371
AuthorsK Tyler (0000-0002-7562-5270, University of Exeter, corresponding author), Joshua Blamire (0000-0002-6282-7332, University of Wolverhampton)
Year2024
Volume73
Issue6
Pages1221-1241
Publication date2024-11-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Sociological Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-0261 • E-ISSN: 1467-954X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00380261241299225
OpenAlexW4404884364
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited25

Some media and political science narratives suggest post-Brexit Britain is locked in a culture war epitomised by the differences thought to divide Leavers and Remainers in terms of their national values, classed and racialised identities. This article sets out to provide a more complex depiction of reality. To do this, we draw on in-depth interviews with individuals across Leave, Remain, national, migrant, racial, ethnic and class identities to trace how they articulate ideas of Empire and nationhood when they discuss Brexit and the legitimacy of statues linked to British histories of colonialism and enslavement. We explore the contrasts and complexities in the ways in which individuals supporting Leave or Remain mobilise what we call their 'Brexit biographies' when they think about questions of Brexit, Empire and nationhood. On the one hand, our Remain interlocutors articulate more politically progressive racialised and classed articulations of Brexit, Empire and nationhood compared to some Leave supporters. However, on the other hand, when we switch context to examine the legitimacy of statues commemorating histories of colonialism and enslavement with some of the same individuals this distinction in the values of Leave and Remain supporters begins to break down. Our contention is that detailed sociological attention to the connections uniting Leavers' and Remainers' reflexive worldviews is required to properly comprehend how individuals experience, as well as reproduce and dislodge, racial, class and national inequalities that underpin the fabric of British society

Aesthetics · Art · Brexit · Class (philosophy) · Empire · Epistemology · Keyhole · Political science · Race (biology) · Sociology · Australian History and Society · Diaspora, migration, transnational identity · Engineering · Gender Studies · Law · Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy · Philosophy

  • Narrating Experiences of the Brexit Divide

    Open Access•Mark Anthony Kaye•The Sociological Review•2026

  • Death and Nationalism's Moral Imperative

    Open Access•Bethan Harries•British Journal of Sociology•2025

  • The new countryside?Ethnicity, nation and exclusion in contemporary rural Britain

    Sarah Neal, Julian Agyeman•The new countryside?Ethnicity,…•2006

  • After Empire

    Paul Gilroy•After Empire•2004

  • Whiteness, Class and the Legacies of Empire

    Open Access•K Tyler•Whiteness, Class and the Legacies…•2012

  • White Women, Race Matters

    Ruth Frankenburg, Ruth Frankenberg•White Women, Race Matters•1993

  • Whiteness, populism and the racialisation of the working class in the United Kingdom and the United States

    Aurelien Mondon, Aaron Winter•Identities•2019

  • Racists,” “Class Anxieties,” Hegemonic Racism, and Democracy in Trump’s America

    Open Access•E Bonilla-Silva•Social Currents•2018

  • Rural Brexit? The ambivalent politics of rural community, migration and dependency

    Open Access•Sarah Neal, Anna Gawlewicz et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2021

  • Brexit and Empire

    R A Saunders, Robert Saunders•The Journal of Imperial &…•2020

  • Slavery and Bristol's ‘golden age’

    David Richardson•Slavery and Abolition•2005

  • The Bifurcation of Politics

    Open Access•Will Jennings, Gerry Stoker•The Political Quarterly•2016

  • Global Britain and the Narrative of Empire

    Open Access•Oliver Turner•The Political Quarterly•2019

  • The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the Left Behind

    Open Access•Matthew Goodwin, Oliver Heath•The Political Quarterly•2016

  • Slavery in Small Things

    Open Access•James Walvin•Slavery in Small Things•2017

  • A Nation Divided

    Open Access•Richard Ford, Robert Ford et al.•Journal of democracy•2017

  • Brexit, Trump, and 'methodological whiteness

    Open Access•G K Bhambra•British Journal of Sociology•2017

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Solen Roth, Silke Roth•Sociological Research Online•2018

  • What's in a vote? Brexit beyond culture wars

    Open Access•I Koch•American Ethnologist•2017

  • Brexit with a little 'b

    Open Access•Cathrine Degnen, K Tyler et al.•Journal of the Royal Anthropologica…•2024

  • Displacing empire

    Alex J Gapud•History and Anthropology•2020

  • The landscape of post-imperial whiteness in rural Britain

    Caroline Knowles•Ethnic and Racial Studies•2008

  • Racial nationalisms

    Sivamohan Valluvan, Virinder S Kalra•Ethnic and Racial Studies•2019

  • Racism, Crisis, Brexit

    Open Access•Satnam Virdee, Brendan Mcgeever•Ethnic and Racial Studies•2018

  • Leavers and Remainers as 'Kinds of People

    Open Access•K Tyler, Cathrine Degnen et al.•Ethnos•2024

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae