Foreign Service Reorganization

While the general policy governing the nature and the degree of American participation in international affairs may still be regarded as a contested issue, an unequivocal decision has been reached with respect to our foreign service.Through the enactment of the Rogers Bill, for the reorganization and improvement of the foreign service, a basis has been fixed and a structure provided which are destined to place the foreign representation of the United States in the forefront of diplomatic efficiency. It is not to be concluded that this strengthening and remodeling of the diplomatic machinery is necessarily anticipatory of a forthcoming broader participation in world affairs, or that Congress has acted in the reverse order of logic by perfecting an instrumentality for the conduct of our foreign relations before the nature and the extent of those relations have been finally determined. The need of a strong foreign service is obvious.The position of the United States has become so commanding that its every act, whether of a positive or of a negative character, is fraught with important consequences to other nations and not infrequently with equally important repercussions at home. A policy of isolation or aloofness, in which the interests of the world are engaged, is perhaps even more difficult to maintain than a policy of active participation

Business · Character (mathematics · Economics · Economy · Foreign policy · Foreign relations · International relations · Isolation (microbiology · Law and economics · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Position (finance · Representation (politics · Service (business · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Military and Defense Studies

• Pretenders, entrepreneurs, and mercurians

  Ameem Lutfi•History and Anthropology•2022

  Add to list