Fanaticism and the Zhuangzi

The Discursive Conditions for Unhealthy Commitments

Bibliographic Data

ID3394056
AuthorsDaniel Sarafinas (0009-0003-9273-6188, East China Normal University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume16
Issue5
Pages560
Publication date2025-04-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReligions (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/rel16050560
OpenAlexW4410008146
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited22

This article utilizes the Zhuangzi's critical approach to language to expand contemporary discourse on the philosophy of fanaticism beyond the conceptual categories derived from European Enlightenment-era critiques of religious and political fanaticism. Recognizing some of the problematic tendencies that stem from the method of comparison itself, an articulation of a post-comparative paradigm is proposed, which emphasizes approaches from non-Western sources that are not predicated upon the comparison of similarities or differences with Western sources. The main body of this article explicates the Zhuangzi's critiques of a linguistically and discursively conditioned fanaticism. These critiques focus on the following: (1) the interdependence of binary linguistic terms that constitute shifei discourse; (2) semiotic chains of cascading distinctions that confound attempts to ground shifei judgements; and (3) the relationship between unhealthy forms of language, thought, and anxieties and a discursively conditioned fanaticism. This article concludes with a brief reflection on how the Zhuangzi's critiques of a linguistically and discursively conditioned fanaticism might open discourse on the philosophy of fanaticism in more ways than by merely adding a token Chinese voice

Epistemology · Fanaticism · Political science · Politics · Chinese history and philosophy · Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics · Law · Philippine History and Culture · Philosophy · Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access