Explaining nineteenth-century bilateralism
Economic and political determinants of the Cobden-Chevalier network1
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3398911 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Munsi Lampe (0000-0002-0859-5091, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, corresponding author), Markus Lampe |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 644-668 |
| Publication date | 2011-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Economic History Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0013-0117 • E-ISSN: 1468-0289 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2010.00558.x |
| OpenAlex | W1501595882 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 40 |
This study investigates the empirical determinants of the treaty network of the 1860s and 1870s. It makes use of three central theories about the determinants of Preferential Trade Agreement (PTA) formation, considering economic fundamentals from neoclassical and ‘new’ trade theory, political-economy variables, and international interaction due to trade diversion fears (dependence of later PTAs on former). These possible determinants are operationalized using a newly constructed dataset for bilateral cooperation and non-cooperation among 13 European countries and the US. The results of logistic regression analysis show that the treaty network can be explained by a combination of ‘pure’ welfare-oriented economic theory with political economy and international interaction models
Bilateralism · Economics · International economics · International trade · Multilateralism · Operationalization · Political science · Politics · Treaty · Welfare · Global Financial Crisis and Policies · Global trade and economics · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Law
A European political-economic space that embraced Japan
Mars or Mercury redux
International trade agreements within the Gatt-WTO paradigm
Discussing Chevalier’s Data on the Efficiency of Tariffs for American and French Canals in the 1830s
Tax revenues and the fiscal cost of trade liberalization, 1792–2006
Revisiting the ‘Cobden-Chevalier network’ trade and welfare effects
Responding to the First Era of Globalization
The French (Trade) Revolution of 1860
Technology and Geography in the Second Industrial Revolution
How Much Trade Liberalization Was There in the World Before and After Cobden-Chevalier
International competition in the first wave of globalization
Globalization and History
Economic determinants of free trade agreements
Interdependent preferential trade agreement memberships
Multilateralising Regionalism
Assessment and Measurement of Regional Integration
Questions of Research Design in Developing New Tests of the Democratic Peace
Trading blocs and the Americas
Regionalism in a Multilateral World
Changing French trade conditions, national welfare, and the 1860 Anglo-French Treaty of Commerce
The Anglo-French Treaty of Commerce of 1860, and the Progress of the Industrial Revolution in France
IV. The Cobden-Chevalier Commercial Treaty of 1860
The Free Trade Diplomacy Debate and the Victorian European Common Market Initiative
Hegemonic stability theory and 19th century tariff levels in Europe
Taking Time Seriously
The Free Trade Epidemic of the 1860s and Other Outbreaks of Economic Discrimination
Bilateral Treaties and The Most-Favored-Nation Clause
Back to the Future
Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries
Multilateral Determinants of Regionalism
The Unconditional Most-Favored-Nation Clause and the Maintenance of the Liberal Trade Regime in the Postwar 1870s
The hegemon's dilemma
Effects of Bilateralism and the MFN Clause on International Trade
Deutschlands Aussenhandel 1836-1856. Eine Statistische Untersuchung zur Fruhindustrialisierung
Assessing the Dyadic Nature of the Democratic Peace, 1918-88
The Anglo-French Treaty of Commerce of 1860 and the Progress of the Industrial Revolution in France
Revisionist Tariff History and the Theory of Hegemonic Stability
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,79 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2023 (12) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |