How to Build a Fence

Bibliographic Data

ID3412496
AuthorsDavid Makovsky (corresponding author)
Year2004
Volume83
Issue2
Pages50
Publication date2004-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueForeign Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0015-7120 • E-ISSN: 2327-7793
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/20033902
OpenAlexW180364363
LanguageEN
Citations received12

THE IDEA of a fence separating Israelis and Palestinians is, on one level, an admission of failure. Yet it is also realistic: with little trust between the two sides and a history of bitterness and bloodshed, a negotiated partition is out of reach (at least for the foreseeable future). Israel's decision to build a separation therefore, makes sense, given that a majority of both Israelis and Palestinians favor a two-state solution that includes an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank but they don't know how to make this happen. Israelis do not trust the Palestinian Authority (PA) to filfill its security obligations and halt terrorist attacks, and Palestinians remain convinced that Israel will never voluntarily cede the West Bank and Gaza. A properly constructed fence could cut through these problems and facilitate a final agreement. A poorly constructed barrier, how ever, would impede such an end. The United States should therefore back a version of the fence that boosts Israeli security without unduly hurting the Palestinians or foreclosing a future return to diplomacy. Washington should also support vigorous, innovative moves to minimize whatever Palestinian suffering even a legitimate fence would cause. And the United States must oppose Israeli fence plans that focus more on politics than on security

Business · Fence (mathematics) · Political science · Structural engineering · Engineering · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub