Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sir Robert Filmer

The Man versus the Whig Myth

Bibliographic Data

ID3426567
AuthorsPeter Laslett (corresponding author)
Year1948
Volume5
Issue4
Pages523
Publication date1948-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe William and Mary Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0043-5597 • E-ISSN: 1933-7698
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1920638
OpenAlexW2315614316
LanguageEN
Citations received6

IT IS OF the nature of political thinking that there should be almost no theorists of conservatism. Defenders of the status quo there always ,are, opposers of change, appealers to every sentiment of timidity, of prudence and of caution. But very rarely do we find systematizers of reaction, seldom makers of what is now and has been, familiar, loved and respected, into a series of intellectual propositions. It can only be for this reason that there has been only one even reasonably effective theoretical conservative in the political history of the English speaking peoples, and why the doctrines of Sir Robert Filmer did duty on the right not only in the English Revolution of i688, but also in the American Revolution of the 1770's and 8o's. The arch-conservative of the American Revolution was an English Tory parson, Jonathan Boucher. It was thus that he dedicated his A View of the Causes and Consequences of the American Revolution, To George Washington, Esq., of Mount Vernon in Fairfax County, Virginia. I was once your neighbour and your friend.' The book's political doctrine was pure Filmerism, the ablest exposition of the patriarchal system that had ever been made. Filmer's political concepts belonged to the late Elizabethan atmosphere, in which Sir Robert was born in 1588. His opinions had been first expressed in that era of complex conflict which led up to the English Civil War and Commonwealth, under which he died in i653. His Patriarcha had become notorious during the controversy of the i68o's, which ended in the Glorious Whig Revolution and the triumph of the teachings of Locke and Sidney. Filmer and patriarchalism lost all their battles and, except for a brief period under Charles II, were always associated with an unpopular and even persecuted minority. So the man himself has been forgotten: his thinking has been misunderstood and mis

Art · Literature · Mythology · American Constitutional Law and Politics

  • Absolutism and royalism

    Open Access•Johann P Sommerville•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • Leveller democracy and the Puritan Revolution

    Open Access•David Wootton•The Cambridge history of…•1991

  • I. Filmer's Patriarchal History

    Open Access•W H Greenleaf•The Historical Journal•1966

  • Without Laslett to the lost worlds

    Open Access•Takuya Furuta•Japanese Journal of Political…•2021

  • He Formation of Liberal Education in England and Scotland

    Open Access•Heinz Rhyn•Studies in Philosophy and Education•1999

  • Early Liberal Roots of Feminism

    Open Access•Melissa A Butler•American Political Science Review•1978

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,1
Citation span1966 - 2021 (56)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae