Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sir Edward Coke's Infidel

"Imperial Anxiety and the Colonial Origins of a "Strange Extrajudicial Opinion

Bibliographic Data

ID3434833
AuthorsDaragh Grant (University of Chicago, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume95
Issue4
Pages771-807
Publication date2023-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Modern History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-2801 • E-ISSN: 1537-5358
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/727384
OpenAlexW4389302618
LanguageEN
References cited16

In the middle of his report on the Case of the Post-nati, also known as Calvin’s Case (1608), Sir Edward Coke drew a distinction between the status of laws in conquered Christian and conquered infidel territories. Scholars have long interpreted this distinction as an expression of Coke’s interest in the Virginia Company, but the assumptions that underpin this colonial reading have recently been called into question. In this article, I revisit the influence of England’s early colonial ventures on Coke’s report. His remarks on infidels, I maintain, were intended to respond to a particular line of argument advanced before the Exchequer Chamber. Specifically, Coke aimed to foreclose the denization of Indigenous Americans in England as a result of colonial conquests, a possibility raised by counsel for both the plaintiff and the defense. Anxious about the potentially disordering implications of imperial expansion, Coke hoped to secure England’s legal order by excluding infidels from English subjecthood. But if this was what Coke intended by his remarks on infidels, what he did was furnish a new justification for colonial conquest that ran contrary to his own aims. In the conclusion of this article, I exploit this disconnect between Coke’s intentions and his actions to make a modest contribution to ongoing debates over the relationship between law and history

Argument (complex analysis) · Coke · Colonialism · Economic history · Economics · Indigenous · Order (exchange) · Political science · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Australian History and Society · Colonialism, slavery, and trade · Engineering · History · Law

  • Oral and Literate Culture in England 1500–1700

    Adam Fox•Oral And Literate Culture In…•2002

  • The Reinvention of Magna Carta 1216–1616

    Open Access•John R Baker, John Baker•Reinvention of Magna Carta…•2017

  • The Province of Legislation Determined

    Open Access•David Lieberman•Province of Legislation Determined•1989

  • Past Sense — Studies in Medieval and Early Modern European History

    Constantin Fasolt•Past Sense — Studies in Medieval…•2014

  • Sir Edward Coke and the Reformation of the Laws

    Open Access•David Chan Smith•Sir Edward Coke and the…•2014

  • Context in the History of International Law

    Andrew Fitzmaurice•Journal of the History of…•2018

  • James I and the beginnings of empire in America

    David B Quinn•The Journal of Imperial &…•1974

  • Law and Fact in Legal Development

    S F C Milsom•University of Toronto Law Journal•1967

  • Francis Bacon on Imperial and Colonial Warfare

    Open Access•Samuel Garrett Zeitlin•The Review of Politics•2021

  • Beyond Anachronism

    Lauren Benton•Journal of the History of…•2019

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae