Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

"Would Confucianism Support Companion Robots? Reflections on Intimacy in the Era of the "Super-Individual

Bibliographic Data

ID3446133
AuthorsChuyuan Qiu (Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, corresponding author), Peter Cheng (0009-0006-3404-6172, Peking University)
Year2025
Volume16
Issue9
Pages1102
Publication date2025-08-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReligions (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/rel16091102
OpenAlexW4413627812
LanguageEN
References cited6

In the era of the "super-individual", companion robots (or sex robots), as novel agents for intimate relationships, have provoked profound ethical controversies. This article responds to Fang Xudong's defense of companion robots in terms of the "instrumentalization of womanhood" and further explores the possible stance of Confucian ethics towards companion robots. Companion robots risk fostering emotional self-deception, which violates the Confucian self-cultivation requirement of "sincerity within, manifesting outwardly" 诚于中,形于外. They also fail to fulfill the "generative virtue" 生生之德 encompassing biological reproduction and moral education through kinship and may even undermine the family's function as a carrier of ethical practice. From a Confucian perspective, the "pseudo-intimacy" facilitated by companion robots might alleviate symptoms of social isolation in an atomized age, but it cannot replace the familial warmth characterized by "affection between father and son, distinct roles between husband and wife" 父子有亲,夫妇有别. Only in the ethical practice of facing the other and taking responsibility can one truly realize the ideal of "cultivating oneself and bringing all things to their ideal state" 成己成物

Aesthetics · Digital era · Psychoanalysis · Robot · Sociology · The Internet · World Wide Web · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Communication · Computer Science · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Health disparities and outcomes · History · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Sex Differences in Jealousy

    Open Access•David M Bu, David M Buss et al.•Psychological Science•1992

  • Loneliness and Social Isolation as Risk Factors for Mortality

    Open Access•Julianne Holt-Lunstad, Tony Bagnall Smith et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2015

  • Centrality and Commonality

    Wei-Ming Tu•Centrality and Commonality•1976

  • Self‐Deception in Human–Sex Robot Intimacy

    Open Access•Jin Hee Lee, Christina Chuang•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2025

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae