Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Nature and Profitability of the Liverpool Slave Trade

Bibliographic Data

ID3446194
AuthorsFrancis E Hyde (University of Liverpool), Bradbury B Parkinson (University of Liverpool), Sheila Marriner (University of Liverpool)
Year1953
Volume5
Issue3
Pages368-377
Publication date1953-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Economic History Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-0117 • E-ISSN: 1468-0289
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1468-0289.1953.tb01476.x
OpenAlexW1990614035
LanguageEN
Citations received16

T HE slave trade provides valuable material for the investigations of the economic historian and, whether its profitability can be determined or not, a study of the surviving records opens up many new lines of approach to the complex interaction of financial forces governing the pattern of Britain's trade and economic development in the eighteenth century. The importance of the many aspects of the slave trade in the economic growth of a flourishing commercial centre such as Liverpool has tended to be misrepresented; the nature of the trade has been misunderstood and its profitability frequently exaggerated. Yet no one who wishes to study the economic history of Liverpool from the point of view of the growth of its industrial, banking, insurance and shipping connexions can ignore the direct influence of the slave trade in the originating and fostering of many of its economic institutions. It is the purpose of this paper to put forward, from an analysis of recently acquired manuscript sources,2 some new considerations respecting the nature and profitability of the Liverpool slave trade in relation to the commercial prosperity of the port. The profitability of the Liverpool slave trade cannot be considered without a survey of its structure. The estimates of individual profits submitted by a representative of Liverpool merchants before the regulation of the trade in I 7883 and those of aggregate profitability made by nineteenth-century historians were based on an over-simplified view of the trade.4 Later writers have not generally been in a position to correct the unrealistic conceptions of earlier writers. An analysis of actual accounts has shown that estimates of profit based on simple exchanges of cargo for negroes and negroes for cash, are in fact misleading, even when receipts from sales of negroes have been adjusted for expenses which some nineteenth-century historians overlooked.5 The complexities arising from the diversity of the trade are ignored and accordingly the

Business · Economics · Profitability index · Colonialism, slavery, and trade · Finance · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Scottish History and National Identity

  • The Fishers of Men

    Open Access•Robert Paul Thomas, Richard Nelson Bean•The Journal of Economic History•1974

  • Market Structure and the Profits of the British African Trade in the Late Eighteenth Century

    Open Access•Joseph E Inikori•The Journal of Economic History•1981

  • The Slave Trade and British Capital Formation in the Eighteenth Century

    Open Access•Stanley L Engerman•The Business History Review•1972

  • Risk and risk management in the Liverpool slave trade

    Sheryllynne Haggerty•Business History•2009

  • Liverpool slave merchant entrepreneurial networks, 1725–1807

    Katie Mcdade•Business History•2011

  • The long-term evolution of economic history

    Open Access•Martina Cioni, Giovanni Federico et al.•Cliometrica•2020

  • Oceans of Finance and Commodification

    Laleh Khalili•Comparative Studies of South Asia…•2022

  • Africans and the Industrial Revolution in England

    Open Access•Joseph E Inikori•Africans and the Industrial…•2002

  • The Commercial Empire of the Atlantic, 1607-1783

    D A Farnie•The Economic History Review•1962

  • Benefitting from brutality? Profits of north‐western Europe's slave trade at the eve of the industrial revolution

    Open Access•Klas Rönnbäck, Guillaume Daudin et al.•The Economic History Review•2026

Unique citing works10
Citations per year0.25
Citation span1962 - 2026 (65)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae