Neglected Aspects of Roger Williams' Thought
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3454149 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mauro Calamandrei (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1952 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 239-258 |
| Publication date | 1952-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Church History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0009-6407 • E-ISSN: 1755-2613 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3162173 |
| OpenAlex | W2128035029 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 6 |
The object of this article is to suggest an interpretation of Roger Williams' thought different from that which is found in most of the literature on the founder of Providence, and to point out some neglected and important aspects of his system of ideas. To summarize it briefly, this interpretation holds that far from being a humanist Roger Williams believed in the radical depravity of man and the necessity of Grace; that far from being a rationalist Williams was a Biblicist; that far from being an optimist in history, Williams was a Millenarian; and rather than being a democratic Baptist Williams believed in the prophetic ministry free from any congregational limitations-in short, that rather than being a man of the Renaissance and the Enlightenment Roger Williams was a Puritan. The orthodox attitude to Roger Williams is misleading because it either distorts, or overlooks, or denies a primary religious concern in his thought and life, as a review of the historiography will readily show
Art · Enlightenment · Epistemology · Historiography · Humanism · Interpretation (philosophy) · Literature · Millenarianism · Political science · Politics · Theology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Classics · History · Law · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,06 |
| Citation span | 1963 - 1997 (35) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |