Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The New Economic History and the Burdens of the Navigation Acts

A Comment

Bibliographic Data

ID3469660
AuthorsPeter D Mcclelland (Cornell University, corresponding author)
Year1973
Volume26
Issue4
Pages679-686
Publication date1973-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Economic History Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-0117 • E-ISSN: 1468-0289
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1468-0289.1973.tb01961.x
OpenAlexW2118258033
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited1

IN a recent article, Gary Walton attempted to discover and then analyse basic defects of three different measures of burden of Navigation Acts. Like Sir Francis Bacon, he sought a vantage point from which to survey the errors, and wanderings, and mists, and tempests, in vale below.2 The resulting evaluation unfortunately contributed more confusion than enlightenment to an already overcast landscape. In assessing work of Lawrence Harper,3 Walton makes two mistakes. The first is to confuse merits of Harper's techniques with merits of his conclusions. By no stretch of generosity can Harper's measurement techniques be labelled anything but nonsensical.4 Walton provides no evidence to contradict this view. He nevertheless suggests that only reason for preferring measurements of Thomas over those of Harper is because former are smaller than latter.5 If a measure is nonsensical, its magnitude is irrelevant. To discredit Harper's estimation procedure is of course not to prove that his final conclusions are incorrect. It does prove that measures in question cannot be used as supporting evidence for any given hypothesis. The second mistake of Walton is his assertion that Jonathan Hughes has eloquently and persuasively defended Harper's conclusions.6 Three rather different questions were examined by Harper: (i) Did entrepot provisions of Navigation Acts place a heavy burden upon colonists? (2) Was overall impact of British mercantilism detrimental to colonial development? (3) To what extent were real economic burdens a contributing cause to American Revolution? What Hughes Dointed out7 was that Robert Thomas's original articles

Assertion · Confusion · Economics · Enlightenment · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Generosity · Law and economics · Laziness · Mercantilism · Mistake · Point (geometry) · Political science · Positive economics · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Statistician · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Colonialism, slavery, and trade · Computer Science · Historical Economic and Social Studies · History · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology

  • The Navigation Acts revisited

    L Sawers•The Economic History Review•1992

  • Mercantilism and the American Revolution

    Open Access•Lawrence A Harper•Canadian Historical Review•1942

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,06
Citation span1992 - 1992 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae