Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Devil Is in the Details

Attorney Effects on Employment Arbitration Outcomes

Bibliographic Data

ID3471187
AuthorsJ Ryan Lamare (0000-0003-4935-2341, J. Ryan Lamare is an Associate Professor at the School of Labor and Employment Relations, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume73
Issue2
Pages456-478
Publication date2020-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueIndustrial and Labor Relations Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0019-7939 • E-ISSN: 2162-271X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0019793919877404
OpenAlexW2976794591
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited25

Conventional wisdom holds that hiring an attorney will improve outcomes for non-union employees who take individual rights complaints to arbitration. The limited empirical scholarship on this topic, however, rarely accounts for the concurrent influence of employer representatives or for differences in attorney characteristics. The author analyzes all arbitration awards rendered within the securities industry for cases filed at the implementation of its ADR program through 2007. Findings show that hiring an attorney benefits employees, but only in the rare instances when employers do not include an agent. In addition, the author examines lawyers' biographical records to determine attorney quality differences and their effects on outcomes conditional on both sides having legal counsel. Findings show that employee and employer attorney characteristics differ and have grown more pronounced over time. These differences can affect awards, particularly to the benefit of employees. The author concludes that although simply hiring any attorney will not redress systematic imbalances within employment arbitration, lawyers are important to the system and certain types of representatives can affect the outcomes of arbitration

Affect (linguistics) · Arbitration · Business · Political science · Quality (philosophy) · Redress · Scholarship · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Labor Movements and Unions · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Psychology

  • Judges’ interpretation of laws and labour rights protection

    Open Access•Chuling Huang•Journal of Industrial Relations•2025

  • Explaining Enterprise Litigation Success with fsQCA

    Open Access•Shilin Zhang, Guilan Yu et al.•SAGE Open•2024

  • A Tale of Two Forums

    Open Access•Mark D Gough•Industrial and Labor Relations…•2021

  • Ambiguity and choice in organizations

    James G March•Ambiguity and choice in…•1979

  • Estimating the Payoff to Attending a More Selective College

    S B Dale, Stacy Dale et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2002

  • A behavioral theory of the firm

    Richard M Cyert•A behavioral theory of the firm•1963

  • Attorney Expertise, Litigant Success, and Judicial Decisionmaking in the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Susan B Haire, Roger E Hartley et al.•Law & Society Review•1999

  • Bargaining and the Role of Expert Agents

    Orley Ashenfelter, Gordon B Dahl•The Review of Economics and…•2012

  • In Defense of Youth

    W Vaughan Stapleton, Lee E Teitelbaum•Stanford Law Review•1973

  • Do Rankings Matter? The Effects of U.S. News & World Report Rankings on the Admissions Process of Law Schools

    Open Access•Michael Sauder, Ryon Lancaster•Law & Society Review•2006

  • Repeat Players in the Supreme Court

    Kevin T Mcguire•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • The Iron Cage Revisited

    P Dimaggio, Paul J Dimaggio et al.•American Sociological Review•1983

  • Elements of Professional Expertise

    Open Access•R L Sandefur•American Sociological Review•2015

  • The Value of Counsel

    Open Access•Karl Monsma, Karl Martin Monsma et al.•Law & Society Review•1992

  • Individual Employment Rights Arbitration in the United States

    Open Access•Alexander J S Colvin, Mark D Gough•Industrial and Labor Relations…•2015

  • DoestheLawyer Matter? Influencing Outcomes on the Supreme Court of Canada

    Open Access•John Szmer, Susan W Johnson et al.•Law & Society Review•2007

  • Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead

    Open Access•M Galanter•Law & Society Review•1974

  • The Impact of Attorneys and Arbitrators on Arbitration Awards

    Open Access•Richard N Block, Jack Stieber•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1987

  • Resolving Discrimination Complaints in Employment Arbitration

    Open Access•J Ryan Lamare, David B Lipsky•Industrial and Labor Relations…•2019

  • Institutional Isomorphism Revisited

    Open Access•Jens Beckert•Sociological Theory•2010

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0.6
Citation span2021 - 2025 (5)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae