Revolutions Without Enemies
Key Transformations in Political Science
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3478636 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John S Dryzek (0000-0001-6358-0047, Australian National University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 100 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 487-492 |
| Publication date | 2006-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0003055406062332 |
| OpenAlex | W2127631740 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 30 |
| References cited | 27 |
American political science is a congenitally unsettled discipline, witnessing a number of movements designed to reorient its fundamental character. Four prominent movements are compared here: the statism accompanying the discipline's early professionalization, the pluralism of the late 1910s and early 1920s, behavioralism, and the Caucus for a New Political Science (with a brief glance at the more recent Perestroika). Of these movements, only the first and third clearly succeeded. The discipline has proven very hard to shift. Despite the rhetoric that accompanied behavioralism, both it and statism were revolutions without enemies within the discipline (other than those appearing after they succeeded), and therein lies the key to their success
Caucus · Character (mathematics · Epistemology · Pluralism (philosophy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Professionalization · Rhetoric · Social science · Sociology · Statism · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Law · Philosophy · Political Science Research and Education · Political Theory and Influence
War
Society on the Edge
Ciência Política na Ufrgs
Liberalism, Pluralism and the Sphere Division in Harold Laski
Introduction to the Special Issue — Social Media and Inquiry into Political Change
Looking Back to Move Forward
The Behavioural Revolution’? A Genealogy of a Concept
Political Science and American Political Thought
The Chicago School That Never Was
Forum
Development anthropology and social engineering
Des partis paradigmatiques
État, administration et politiques publiques
Razvoj i institucionalizacija komparativne politike u hrvatskoj političkoj znanosti
The Intellectual Origins of New Political Science
Frankfurt Meets Chicago
The Practical Process of Gender Mainstreaming in the Political Science Curriculum
Bringing What State Back In? Neo-Marxism and the Origin of the Committee on States and Social Structures
Bounded Rationality without Bounded Democracy
Statist political science and American Marxism
The Profiles of Political Science and Political Scientists in Mexico
Trends in Political Science Research and the Progress of Comparative Politics
Still Pluralist After All These Years? Considering Whether Political Science Fosters Tolerance for Dissent or Merely Promotes Leftist Values
The Rebels' Yell
Disseram que eu voltei americanizada
Urban Politics
The Ford Foundation and the Rise of Behavioralism in Political Science
A quem pertence o estudo da democracia? Sociologia, ciência política e a promessa da interdisciplinaridade na Sociologia política desde 1945
Setting the Stage for Disciplinary Transformations
Landmarks in the Evolution of Liberal Thought
The new state
Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics
Bringing the State Back In
A Preface to Democratic Theory, Expanded Edition
Disenchanted Realists
The Science and Method of Politics
The Political System
Political Science on the Cusp
The Progress of Political Science
Resurrecting the Pluralist Universe
Political Science in the United States
Journals in the Discipline
The Real Revolution in Political Science
The Study of Administration
The Return to the State
Research in the Political Process
Politics and Pseudopolitics
American Political Science, Liberalism, and the Invention of Political Theory
| Unique citing works | 30 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,58 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2024 (18) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 30 |