Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

O Piteous Spectacle! O Bloody Times

The Faithlessness of English Identity in 1, 2, and 3 Henry VI

Bibliographic Data

ID3484301
AuthorsMatthew Carter (0000-0001-5425-8160), Matt Carter (0000-0003-1653-1271, Clayton State University, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume15
Issue1
Pages13
Publication date2023-12-21
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReligions (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/rel15010013
OpenAlexW4390052554
LanguageEN
References cited9

Shakespeare's Henry VI trilogy is jam-packed with spectacle: heads are severed and made to kiss, women dress as men and lead armies, ghosts predict the future, and a plethora of miracles take place all over the various locales we visit across fifteen acts. In fact, if "faith is... the evidence of things not seen," as asserted by the author of Hebrews, then the Henry VI plays are entirely devoid of faith, by the merit of bringing miraculous events from the realm of faith into the realm of observational knowledge. Of note, then, is the fact that the trilogy depicts Henry as a weak king whose main virtue is his commitment to his faith. Compared to other kings in Shakespearean history plays, Henry is almost-constantly referencing the spiritual world, and the world he lives in is so full of miraculous happenings that miracles themselves run the risk of becoming banal. Perhaps surprisingly, given the trilogy's thematic investment in miracles and spirituality, the English are defined in the plays as destroying or debunking miraculous spectacles. From Gloucester outsmarting Simpcox in his feigned healing to the putting-down of two witches (Joan in 1 Henry VI and Margery Jourdain in 2 Henry VI), it seems that, despite Henry's incredible devotion, his courtiers raise skepticism to the level of modus operandi. In this essay, I hope to examine the way that the second Henriad depicts a version of England that places logic and skepticism in the seat of faith, while its ruler's faith is often both uninterrogated and misplaced. Shakespeare stages a teleology of spectacle that highlights English faithlessness as a source of internecine struggle and insurrection, while also cautioning against naivete in the face of canny nemeses

Aesthetics · Art · Art history · Faith · Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor · Literature · Performance art · Political science · Realm · Skepticism · Spectacle · Theology · Trilogy · Virtue · History · Irish and British Studies · Joseph Conrad and Literature · Law · Literature: history, themes, analysis · Philosophy

  • Manhood and the Duel

    Open Access•Jennifer A Low, Jennifer Low•Manhood and the Duel•2003

  • Shakespeare's Joan and the Great Whore of Babylon

    Patrick Ryan•Renaissance and Reformation•2004

  • Unnaturalness in Shakespeare's 3 Henry VI

    Maurice Hunt•English Studies•1999

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae