Exegesis and the History of Theology
Reflections on the Adam-Christ Typology in Cyril of Alexandria
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3489558 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert L Wilken (Lutheran Theological Seminary at Gettysburg, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1966 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 139-156 |
| Publication date | 1966-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Church History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0009-6407 • E-ISSN: 1755-2613 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3162279 |
| OpenAlex | W2106058136 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 7 |
The history of exegesis as a discipline is one of the stepchildren of Church History. As such it has not only been neglected by Church historians, but even if studied, it has received inferior treatment. Surely there is something ironical about an age of theological scholarship which has so self-consciously bought the historical method to study the Bible, but which nevertheless allows scholars to be so un-historical in their approach to the history of its interpretation. Consider that much of the material in the history of exegesis has been mined by scholars whose proper business is the study of the Old and New Testaments; or that the history of interpretation is usually considered a part of biblical studies. Inevitably the question asked by biblical scholars sounds something like this: how does a man, a school, or epoch interpret such and such a passage? Frequently this question issues in monographs tracing the history of interpretations of the chosen passage. The result is usually a catena of citations classifying and cataloguing the answers given to problems in the text. Most often the perspective brought to the material is that of the contemporary exegete, who, either explicitly or implicitly thinks he knows what the passage meant-or at least what it could not mean
Archaeology · Art · Exegesis · Historical Jesus · Historical method · History of religions · Interpretation (philosophy) · Literature · New Testament · Scholarship · Theology · Typology · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Law · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,28 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2025 (18) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |