Christian Neoplatonism and Deep Incarnation
Nicholas of Cusa and Giordano Bruno as Inspirations for Contemporary Ecotheology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3495384 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthew Eaton (0009-0003-8552-3336, Georgetown University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 374 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel15030374 |
| OpenAlex | W4393044886 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 15 |
In response to the specter of looming anthropogenic ecological catastrophe, many Christian thinkers have begun to rethink the God/world relationship and reimagine the ontic cleavage between divinity and creation. The idea of "deep incarnation", which expands the scope of divine incarnation in an attempt to draw God and creation into closer relation, is a prevalent framework for such reimagination. Two historic, underutilized thinkers that might help deep incarnation theologians expand their own theologies and make sense of the conceptual and ethical differences among them are Neo-Platonist philosopher-theologians Nicholas of Cusa and Giordano Bruno. Working within an ecofeminist framework, this article argues that while both Cusanus and Bruno provide significant philosophical grounds for contemporary ecotheologies of deep incarnation, a Brunist perspective is preferable because of its more expansive anthropology and its more inclusive understanding of divinity
Art · Incarnation · Neoplatonism · Theology · Philosophy · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |