The Degeneration of EMU

Bibliographic Data

ID3512504
AuthorsNiall Ferguson, Laurence J Kotlikoff
Year2000
Volume79
Issue2
Pages110
Publication date2000-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueForeign Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0015-7120 • E-ISSN: 2327-7793
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/20049644
OpenAlexW2544455968
LanguageEN
Citations received7

From conception through gestation and birth, and now in its early infancy, the euro has consistently proved the skeptics wrong. Some Cassandras thought that Brussels-bashing nationalists would reject the single currency in referendums. Others doubted that Italy and other fiscally troubled applicants would fulfill the Maastricht Treaty's strict limits on budget deficits and national debt. Still others predicted that the fierce 1998 dispute over the presidency of the European Central Bank might abort the entire enterprise. Yet economic and monetary union (emu) has proceeded more or less according to plan. The French referendum's petit oui in 1992 may have required a little gentle massaging; the Maastricht fiscal criteria may have been honored partly in the breach; and of course the currency has, over the past year, depreciated markedly against the dollar. But the fixed exchange rates within the eurozone have held firm, despite warnings about speculative attacks during the transition. And with its depreciation spurring economic growth, the euro is likely to recover somewhat against the dollar this year. Nevertheless, the skeptics may have the last laugh. For whether a euro equals a dollar tomorrow or the next day does not really matter

Degeneration (medical) · Economics · Keynesian economics · Pathology · Political science · European Monetary and Fiscal Policies · Medicine

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub