Wrong Turn in Somalia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3526318 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John R Bolton (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1994 |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 56 |
| Publication date | 1994-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Foreign Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0015-7120 • E-ISSN: 2327-7793 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/20045891 |
| OpenAlex | W2264352106 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
Since the end of the Persian Gulf War, pressure has mounted to involve the United Nations in a growing number of countries that are experiencing internal civil strife. Somalia is the paradigm case. It is therefore extremely important to clarify the historical decision-making record. What President Bush originally decided and what the Clinton administration later did represent funda mentally divergent approaches. The Bush administration sent U.S. troops into Somalia strictly to clear the relief channels that could avert mass starvation. It resisted
Biology · Development economics · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Turn (biochemistry) · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Leadership at Risk
America's response to the new world (dis)order
Explaining peacekeeping performance
Rivals or partners? Bureaucratic politics and the evolution of us peacekeeping policy
Humanitarian crises and U.S. foreign policy
Rhetoric of Atrocities
Discursos em disputa
To Intervene or Not to Intervene? Democratic Constraints on Third-Party Support in Civil Wars
From Peacekeeping to Peace Enforcement
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,28 |
| Citation span | 1994 - 2022 (29) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |