Labor Responds to Compulsory Arbitration
Organizational Correlates of Protest and Acquiescence
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3526341 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J David Colfax (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1966 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 76-87 |
| Publication date | 1966-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Industrial and Labor Relations Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0019-7939 • E-ISSN: 2162-271X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/001979396602000105 |
| OpenAlex | W2026578177 |
| Language | EN |
Examination of the organized labor's response to the Public Law 88-108, legislation requiring compulsory arbitration of an industrial dispute in the United States. Position of labor organization on arbitration of dispute; Relationship between organizational size and political activism; Quality of union's action. (Abstract copyright EBSCO.)
Acquiescence · Action (physics) · Arbitration · Business · Compulsory arbitration · Economics · Industrial and organizational psychology · Labor disputes · Labor relations · Labor union · Labour economics · Law and economics · Legislation · Political science · Politics · Position (finance) · Labor Movements and Unions · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |