Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Trustees of Georgia and the House of Commons, 1732-1752

Bibliographic Data

ID3536044
AuthorsRichard S Dunn (0009-0006-2613-6477, corresponding author)
Year1954
Volume11
Issue4
Pages551
Publication date1954-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe William and Mary Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0043-5597 • E-ISSN: 1933-7698
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1923077
OpenAlexW2333521640
LanguageEN
Citations received3

HE founders of the charitable colony of Georgia are often pictured as impractical idealists, but they were at least practical enough to induce the British government to pay for their new colony when private funds proved insufficient. The Trustees who governed Georgia between 1732 and 1752 spent about ?155,000 on their enterprise, more than ?136,000 of which was granted by Parliament.' In addition, the Treasury paid for the colony's military expenses, which totalled over 1ioo,ooo during the war with Spain in the I740's.2 The government, therefore, contributed better than go per cent of Georgia's financial support. But while it is hardly possible that the Trustees could have kept their colony going more than a year or two without being subsidized by public money, this subsidization was unorthodox, for the government had never before supported a privately operated colony. To be sure, Georgia was strategically valuable in England's struggle with Spain and France for southeastern America. The colony's operation was expected to benefit the British economy, producing needed raw materials, like silk, and relieving unemployment at home. Its establishment was a public-spirited action; the Trustees were working without pay to make a new home in America for unfortunate Englishmen and persecuted foreign Protestants. But the England of Sir Robert Walpole was no welfare state, and his government would scarcely have been persuaded to pay almost the entire bill for Georgia, no matter how worthy a project the colony was, if its promoters had not been public men and hard to refuse. So it is significant that a large number of the Trustees of Georgia were also members of Parliament

Commons · House of Commons · Political science · Politics · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Law · Public Administration

  • Philanthropy as politics

    Open Access•Arye L Hillman•European Journal of Political…•2024

  • Recent Contributions to American Economic History

    Open Access•Lawrence A Harper•The Journal of Economic History•1959

  • Planting families

    Brandon Marsh, Ben Marsh•The History of the Family•2007

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,04
Citation span1959 - 2024 (66)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae