Sovereign State or Sovereign Group
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3540809 |
|---|---|
| Authors | W Y Elliott (University of California System, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1925 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 475-499 |
| Publication date | 1925-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2939129 |
| OpenAlex | W2326384582 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 3 |
The late Professor William A. Dunning is reported to have said of the recent political theories which attempt to replace the conception of state sovereignty by some pluralistic grouping of social forces, that they were "radically unintelligible." It is hard for political theorists who have been accustomed to regard the conception of sovereignty as a foundation stone and a sort of "rock of ages" for their faith to be told (as one is every day, more or less) that the anti-intellectualistic type of a sociological basis is the only valid one for juristic structure. For that, according to the old rationalistic conceptions of analytical jurisprudence, is indeed to base sovereignty upon shifting sands and to deprive law of any special significance of its own by equating it with social reactions of the most indeterminate character. But the anti-intellectualistic trend of modern political theory indignantly denies this charge. The assumption, it counters, that any legal center of reference can be final in its authority or in its right to command is an outworn Hegelianism, discredited by practice and theory alike. Law is too much a thing of fictions to be taken seriously in its claims, when it pretends to be giving an accurate description of facts in the abstract terms of a pretended right on the part of the state to be the sole author of enforceable commands and the only rightful claimant of men's ultimate loyalty
Jurisprudence · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereignty · State (computer science · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Political Theory and Influence · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,09 |
| Citation span | 1927 - 2010 (84) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |