A Strategy of Partnerships
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3544262 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Colin L Powell (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 83 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 22 |
| Publication date | 2004-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Foreign Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0015-7120 • E-ISSN: 2327-7793 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/20033826 |
| OpenAlex | W2542302687 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 26 |
WHEN MOST PEOPLE think about U.S. foreign policy these days, they think first and sometimes only about aspects of the war on terror ism: the reconstruction of Iraq and Afghanistan, the troubles of the Middle East, and the terror cells lurking in Southeast Asia, Europe, and even the United States. This preoccupation is natural. Interna tional terrorism literally hit home on September 1i, 2001, and, for understandable reasons, an outraged American public wants those responsible brought to justice. The American people also want to understand why the attacks happened-and demand a foreign policy that makes sure such events will never happen again. It is also natural that the war on terrorism has become the United States' number one foreign policy priority. It will remain so for as long as necessary, because terrorism-potentially linked to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD)-now represents the greatest threat to American lives. Defeating terrorism is a priority that drives not only military action to subdue individual terrorists and deter their state supporters but also multilateral cooperation in law enforcement and intelligence sharing. It encompasses efforts both to stigmatize terrorism as a political instrument and to reduce the underlying sources of terrorist motivation and recruitment. But the breadth of U.S. strategy transcends the war on terrorism. Indeed, a strategy limited to dealing with immediate threats would in the end fail to defeat them-just as bailing water out of a boat would not fix a leak. The sharp focus on the front lines of the war against
Business · Political science · Process management · Military and Defense Studies · Public Administration
Building a New Conceptual Framework for U.S.-China Relations
An Anatomy of the Transformation of the US–Turkish Alliance
Sources of Change in United States–United Nations Relations
Ghosts of “Old Europe”? US-German Relations Under the Red-Green Coalition in Berlin
Honor the goddess and the cow
Embedding Security into Free Trade
Leaky Borders and Solid Citizens
Anti-Americanism in Turkey
Crime Data in Mainland China
Managing the Transatlantic Gap
Preemption in the Bush Doctrine
The Great Illusion
The Deal
Virtue Unrestrained
Bowling by the same rules? Eu-United Nations relations and the transatlantic partnership
The limits of strategic partnerships
The US–UK 'Special Relationship' in a world twice transformed
TheWidening Military Capabilities Gap between the United States and Europe
Preemption and the Evolution of America’s Strategic Defense
Counterterrorism and International Power Relations
The end of alliances? Not so fast
International Intelligence Liaison in the Afghan Theatre of War
Beyond the West
The Democratic Peace is What States Make of It
The vulnerability of securitisation
Just Whose Side Is Time On
| Citations per year | 1.18 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2004 - 2026 (23) |
| Highly cited | No |