Ernst Bloch as a Non-Simultaneous Jewish Marxist
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3544639 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Przemysław Tacik (0000-0001-7174-1752, Jagiellonian University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 346 |
| Publication date | 2018-11-06 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel9110346 |
| OpenAlex | W2899782724 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 8 |
The paper attempts to reassess the fundamentally paradoxical position of Ernst Bloch in 20th century philosophy in the light of the Marranic condition. Indebted, among others, to Jewish heritage and Christian tradition, Bloch considered himself primarily a Marxist. Bloch's uniqueness consists in the stunning equiponderance of the currents he drew from. Contrary to a classic model of modern Jewish philosophy, inaugurated by Hermann Cohen, Bloch's thinking does not allow of easy juxtaposition of "sources" with languages into which they were translated. In this sense, Bloch cannot be easily compared to Franz Rosenzweig, Emmanuel Levinas or even Walter Benjamin (although he bore some striking similarities with the latter). His position at least partly stems from a specific form of directness with which he often used these languages, composing his philosophy in quite an anachronist manner. For this reason his thinking-in itself "die Gleichzeitigkeit des Ungleichzeitigen", as one of his key concepts theorises-is a very modern, internally incoherent space of cross-fertilising inspirations. The paper demonstrates two levels on which Bloch's indebtedness to Judaism might be analysed and then re-assesses his Marxist affiliations as a kind of modern faith which, in a specifically Marranic manner, seals the simultaneity of the non-simultaneous
Epistemology · Judaism · Marxist philosophy · Physics · Politics · Quantum mechanics · Simultaneity · Theology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|