Ontological Beliefs and Hunter-Gatherer Ritual Landscapes
Native Californian Examples
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3549162 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D S Whitley (0000-0002-1647-1427, University of the Witwatersrand, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 123 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel15010123 |
| OpenAlex | W4390943740 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 43 |
Landscapes are socially produced and reproduced spaces. This is easily recognizable for large-scale urban groups with built environments that dominate living places. But it also pertains to all types of societies and cultures, even small-scale hunter-gatherers, once the ontological beliefs structuring landscape perception and use are acknowledged. The foragers of south-central and southern California and the Great Basin illustrate this fact. They maintained a widely shared ontological perspective supported by a fundamental cognitive postulate. This is that supernatural power, the principle causative agent in the universe, was differentially distributed among individuals and places. The distribution of power, revealed by certain geomorphological features and natural events, structured their perceptions of landscape. These perceptions were expressed in ritual and symbolism, including petroglyphs and pictographs as durable manifestations of ceremonies on the landscape. The ontological relationship between power and landscape explains a longstanding question in hunter-gatherer archaeology: Why were rock writing sites created at specific locations? It also explains another equally significant but rarely considered and related problem: Why do some localities have massive quantities of rock writings that dwarf most other sites? The landscape symbolism of and the placement of sites by Native Californian and Great Basin tribes is explained by reference to their shared ontological beliefs, illustrating how they structured their ritual practices and archaeological record
Aesthetics · Archaeology · Art · Biology · Cartography · Environmental resource management · Epistemology · Geography · Hunter-gatherer · Landscape archaeology · Landscape design · Perception · Structural basin · Structuring · Visual arts · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Archaeology and Natural History · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies · History · Philosophy · Ecology · Geology · Paleontology
Universalism without Uniformity
The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology and Anthropology of Hunter-Gatherers
Archaeological Evidence for Conceptual Metaphors as Enduring Knowledge Structures
Petroglyphs and p uha
Anthropological Perspectives on Environmental Communication
Acculturation in Seven American Indian Tribes
Anthropology of the Numa
Finding Fault
Sally's Rockshelter and the Archaeology of the Vision Quest
Shamanism and Rock Art in Far Western North America
Landscapes of the Ghost Dance
By the hunter, for the gatherer
Archaeologies of Ontology
Shoshonean Tales
Mythology of the Mission Indians
The Story of the Chaup
When the Mountain Dwarfs Danced
African Traditional Thought and Western Science
A Brief Sketch of Serrano Culture
The masters of the animals among the Wind River Shoshoni
Socioreligious context and rock art in east-central California
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 8 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |