The Methodology of the Modernists
Process in American Protestantism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3549219 |
|---|---|
| Authors | K Lofton (0000-0002-1069-4945, Indiana University Bloomington, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 374-402 |
| Publication date | 2006-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Church History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0009-6407 • E-ISSN: 1755-2613 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0009640700111357 |
| OpenAlex | W2140311016 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 29 |
Scholarship on early-twentieth-century American Protestant modernism appears to have arrived at an impasse. Although scholars continue to explore the biographical contours of modernist individuals, and theologians still review the capacity of modernist theologies, the body of analytical scholarship on the "modernist impulse" has failed to keep apace with the glut of materials addressing its fraternal twin, fundamentalism. Published in 1976, William Hutchison'sThe Modernist Impulse in American Protestantismremains the last significant historical commentary on the cultural and intellectual dynamics of Protestant modernism. In that masterful exegesis, Hutchison supplied the classic definition of this impulse, arguing that despite the diversity of its participants and complexity of their thought, the modernist movement in America could be accurately summarized as a shared commitment to cultural adaptation, God's immanent role in human development, and a postmillennial progressivism. While this tripartite formulation still provides the authoritative elucidation of early-twentieth-century Protestant thought, a reappraisal of the modernist canon reveals that Christian liberals not only were invested in theological overhaul and intellectual malleability, but also persistently specified an elaborate methodological structure for belief. In works such as Minot Savage'sJesus and Modern Life(1898), Margaret Benson'sThe Venture of Rational Faith(1908), Douglas Clyde Macintosh'sTheology as an Empirical Science(1919), J. Macbride Sterrett'sModernism in Religion(1922), and Henry Nelson Wieman'sThe Wrestle of Religion with Truth(1927), seminarians and ministers offered detailed descriptions of how Protestants should think in the modern era. These were not expansive tracts bent on exploring the fluid boundaries of faith in a plural culture; rather, these were precise, pointed exhortations on the virtue of scrupulous historical research, scriptural comparison, and relentless self-examination. Rather than continue to translate Protestant modernism as cultural acquiescence and enthusiastic historicism, this essay suggests that a recalibrated portrait of this movement is needed
Art · Faith · Fundamentalism · Literature · Political science · Protestantism · Scholarship · Sociology · Theology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History · Law · Mormonism, Religion, and History · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Religious studies
Defenders of God
Fundamentalism and American Culture
Discipline and Punish
On Difficulty and Other Essays
Five Faces of Modernity
Perspectives on Method and Theory in the Study of Religion
The Modernist Impulse in American Protestantism
Change and Continuity in Twentieth-Century America
On Difficulty and Other Essays
Theology as an Empirical Science
Modernist Impulses in the Human Sciences, 1870-1930
Revolt Against Modernism
Revolt against Modernism
When Is a Fundamentalist a Modernist? J. Gresham Machen, Cultural Modernism, and Conservative Protestanism
Discipline and Punish
The Modernist Movement in the Church of England
What Is Modernism
Jesus and Modern Life
Modern Trends in World-Religions
From Max Weber
The New Religious Politics
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,17 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2016 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |