William James
The Mystical Experimentation of a Sick Soul
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3561978 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David H Nikkel (0000-0003-4471-2563, University of North Carolina at Pembroke, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 961 |
| Publication date | 2024-08-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel15080961 |
| OpenAlex | W4401455573 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 8 |
Especially in The Varieties of Religious Experience, William James developed the polar categories of healthy-minded individuals content with their once-born religion versus sick souls who need to become twice-born in order to find religious peace. Biographers of James have concluded that he does not fit well under either of his polar categories. Drawing on both data about James' life and on his philosophical and theological writings, I demur from the biographers' conclusion and instead advance the thesis that the overall pattern of William James' life is best understood as a sick soul searching for-and ultimately finding-twice-born religion in connection with mystical experiences. Notably, James attempted to theorize about mystical experiences as connecting with divine reality/ies in naturalistic ways compatible with scientific knowledge of his time. Scientific knowledge today makes it more difficult to find evidence of direct divine input in religious experiences, yet one might find value in religious experiences in terms of James' pragmatic criterion for truth: their beneficial or adaptive effects
Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Mysticism · Psychoanalysis · Soul · Theology · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Evolution and Science Education · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs · Philosophy · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |