Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

When and how do we deal with straw men? A normative and cognitive pragmatic account

Bibliographic Data

ID3563103
AuthorsMarcin Lewiński (0000-0002-7218-3948, Universidade Nova de Lisboa), Steve Oswald (0000-0002-5946-1691, University of Neuchâtel, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume59
Pages164-177
Publication date2013-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Pragmatics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0378-2166 • E-ISSN: 1879-1387
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.001
OpenAlexW2148430261
LanguageEN
Citations received16
References cited28

Argument (complex analysis · Argumentation theory · Cognition · Covert · Dialectic · Epistemology · Fallacy · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Misrepresentation · Normative · Perspective (graphical · Pragmatics · Representation (politics · Rhetorical question · Computer Science · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Philosophy · Psychology

  • The Pandemic of Argumentation

    Open Access•Greco, Steve Oswald et al.•The Pandemic of Argumentation•2022

  • Pragmatique cognitive, argumentation et perlocution

    Open Access•Steve Oswald•Argumentation et analyse du…•2020

  • (Mis)representing the Opposition and Rhetorical Success

    Open Access•Ramy Younis•Argumentation•2026

  • Corpus Linguistics Methods in the Study of (Meta)Argumentation

    Open Access•Martin Hinton•Argumentation•2021

  • The Linguistic Formulation of Fallacies Matters

    Open Access•John Schumann, Sandrine Zufferey et al.•Argumentation•2021

  • Do You Want to Build a Straw Man

    Open Access•Eugen Octav Popa•Argumentation•2026

  • Fooling the Victim

    Katharina Stevens•Philosophy and Rhetoric•2021

  • Fallacies and biases

    Open Access•Ermioni Seremeta, Monique Flecken et al.•Pragmatics & Cognition•2024

  • Managing disagreement through yes, but … constructions

    Open Access•Mehmet Ali Üzelgün, Dima Mohammed et al.•Discourse Studies•2015

  • Capone, Alessandro

    Fabrizio Macagno•Intercultural Pragmatics•2017

  • In the quagmire of quibbles

    Open Access•Erik C W Krabbe, Jan Albert van Laar•Synthese•2021

  • Reproductive rights or duties? The rhetoric of division in social media debates on abortion law in Poland

    Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska, Michaela Wänke•Social movement studies•2019

  • Ignoring Qualifications as a Pragmatic Fallacy

    Open Access•Fabrizio Macagno•Languages•2022

  • More than Relata Refero

    Open Access•Francesca Gobbo, Marco Benini et al.•Languages•2022

  • Pragmatics for argumentation

    Open Access•Steve Oswald•Journal of Pragmatics•2023

  • What makes a straw man acceptable? Three experiments assessing linguistic factors

    Open Access•John Schumann, Jennifer Schumann et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2019

  • Indirect speech acts

    Open Access•John R Searle•Expression and Meaning•1979

  • Judgment under Uncertainty

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Utility, Probability, and Human…•1975

  • Logic and Conversation

    H P Grice•Speech Acts•1975

  • A Systematic Theory of Argumentation

    Open Access•Frans H Van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst•Systematic Theory of Argumentation•2003

  • Les Mécanismes de la crédulité

    Fabrice Clément•Les mécanismes de la credulité•2006

  • Relevance

    Lieselotte Pust, Dan Sperber et al.•Language•1997

  • Meaning

    H P Grice•The Philosophical Review•1957

  • Structure of conversational argument

    Sally Jackson, Scott Jacob et al.•Quarterly Journal of Speech•1980

  • Logic and argumentation

    Gladys Murphy Graham•Quarterly Journal of Speech•1924

  • Thoughts and Utterances

    Robyn Carston•Thoughts and Utterances•2002

  • From interpretation to consent

    Open Access•Steve Oswald•Discourse Studies•2011

  • Relevance

    Open Access•François Nemo•Journal of Pragmatics•1988

  • Constraining context selection

    D Maillat•Journal of Pragmatics•2013

  • Speech Acts

    Open Access•John R Searle•Speech acts•1969

Unique citing works16
Citations per year1,45
Citation span2015 - 2026 (12)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 16

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae