Decision Making in Soviet Cities

Bibliographic Data

ID3564764
AuthorsB Michael Frolic (York University, corresponding author)
Year1972
Volume66
Issue1
Pages38-52
Publication date1972-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1959277
OpenAlexW2085683637
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited8

How are decisions made in Soviet cities? Who are the municipal decision makers? What kinds of decisions do they make? Is there a Soviet urban political system? This article attempts to answer these questions by focusing on four aspects of decision making in Soviet cities: budget formulation, the planning process, housing construction and allocation, and the staffing of key municipal posts.Urban autonomy has increased in the past decade, but Soviet municipalities are very much restricted in their decision making. Superior Party and governmental authorities continue to dominate the decision-making process and any decision made by municipal authorities can be vetoed by superior Party and governmental organs.Soviet municipal decision making is now being influenced by three tendencies: municipal administrators are acquiring more influence in municipal government and administration; the educational qualifications and professional expertise of city Party members are rising; ad hoc citizen and group interest articulation may be developing. Comparisons between Soviet and North American urban decision-making models are useful and valid, although they require an improved methodology and much more Soviet data

Articulation (sociology · Autonomy · Business · Decentralization · Decision-making · Government (linguistics · Political science · Politics · Process (computing · Staffing · Law · Marketing · Public Administration · Urbanization and City Planning

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub