Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Consolidating Power in Revolutionary America

The Case of New York, 1775-1783

Bibliographic Data

ID3578701
AuthorsEdward Countryman (corresponding author)
Year1976
Volume6
Issue4
Pages645
Publication date1976-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-1953 • E-ISSN: 1530-9169
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/202535
OpenAlexW2334695864
LanguageEN
Citations received4

Consolidating Power in Revolutionary America: The Case of New York, 1775-1783 Between October 2, 1777 and February 7, 1778 the newly founded state assembly of New York took votes on the state supreme court, on prohibiting the sale of scarce grain to customers out of the state, and on an extraconstitutional convention that had seized power in the face of a military crisis in the late autumn of 1777 and that held it until the legislature could reassemble.I There is no reason, on the face of it, to expect any relationship among these divisions; none of them was a party issue and none of them was identified with the governor, George Clinton. Yet these votes-there were five in all-formed a single Guttman scale.2 In other words, voting patterns showed that the votes turned on a single basic issue: the existence and powers of the extralegal convention and other bodies like it. The problem with the court was the refusal of its judges, named to their posts by an earlier extralegal convention, to carry out their duties until reappointed constitutionally. The debate over the embargo bill asked whether the assembly should merely continue a prohibition already imposed by the convention or whether it should impose a new one, without mentioning the convention at all. The issue, in short, was legitimacy: should New York's constitutional republican institutions recognize the power that revolutionary bodies had exercised in the state since the collapse of the colonial government ? And if they did, would that betoken an abandonment of their own claim to be the sole legitimate political power in the state ? Conventional wisdom says that such a problem should not have existed in revolutionary America. Ever since its French counterpart provided a first basis for comparison, students of the American Revolution have remarked on the ease and smoothness with which that event

Economic history · Environmental ethics · Physics · Political science · Power (physics) · American Constitutional Law and Politics · American History and Culture · Historical Economic and Legal Thought · History · Philosophy

  • Congressional and State Legislative Roll-Call Studies by U. S. Historians

    Open Access•Joel H Silbey•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1981

  • New York's Refugees and Political Authority in Revolutionary America

    Dziennik, Dziennik Dziennik•The William and Mary Quarterly•2020

  • State Repression in the Iranian Bazaar, 1975–1977

    Open Access•Nimah Mazaheri•Iranian Studies•2006

  • Labor in the era of the American revolution

    Gary B Nash, Billy G Smith et al.•Labor History•1983

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,09
Citation span1981 - 2020 (40)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae