Tertullian's Polemic Against Social Co-optation

Bibliographic Data

ID3584793
AuthorsDennis E Groh (Garrett–Evangelical Theological Seminary, corresponding author)
Year1971
Volume40
Issue1
Pages7-14
Publication date1971-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueChurch History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0009-6407 • E-ISSN: 1755-2613
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3163101
OpenAlexW2076288462
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited10

One of the major strengths of a political and technological system is its ability to absorb into itself and to direct toward social purposes the aspirations and abilities of diverse groups and peoples. Empire, as opposed to despotism, traffics in the relentless proclivity of societal man to find contentment in the culture's values and personal advancement within the society's political, social, and economic structures. To paraphrase an old political maxim, a man who can be rewarded by the social system can be ruled by it. In this proclivity of societal man to make a place for himself in the social structures lay one of the major dangers to the church of Tertullian's day. Tertullian's attempt to lay the foundations for a divine community which could withstand the "pull" of society's "success" or "status" ethic on Christians is the focus of this article. It goes without saying that Tertullian's understanding of the essentially unique and separate character of the Christian community was also formulated against the heretics' theological "push," but I would like to concentrate on the social problem in keeping with the theme of the meeting

Aesthetics · Character (mathematics) · Contentment · Environmental ethics · Maxim · Paraphrase · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Theme (computing) · Byzantine Studies and History · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub