"Sustainable International Relations. Pope Francis' Encyclical Laudato Si' and the Planetary Implications of "Integral Ecology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3586597 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul Ferrara (0000-0003-2035-1548, Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 466 |
| Publication date | 2019-08-05 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel10080466 |
| OpenAlex | W2965145956 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 25 |
This paper analyzes the theoretical and pragmatic implications for international relations and world politics of the new holistic approach to climate change articulated by Pope Francis in the Encyclical Laudato Si', particularly through the notion of "integral ecology". It is not my intention to offer an exegesis of the Papal document. I will rather try to illustrate and discuss its planetary hermeneutics. I emphasize that the Encyclical's perspective is not exclusively normative, and that, within the dynamic interplay between social structure and human agency, it can also be considered as a call to action. In this context, I suggest that both International Relations Theory and global politics have much to learn from the fundamental claims of contemporary religions in relation to climate disruption. In particular, Pope Francis' document, far from being just a new chapter in the unfolding process of the "greening" of religions, raises the issue of the sustainability of the present world system. Therefore, I contend that the perspective of the Encyclical calls for a radical transformation of international relations, since it emphasizes the deep implications of environmental issues on the entire spectrum of security, development, economic and ethical challenges of contemporary world politics. Against this backdrop, my objective is to connect the main tenets of the Encyclical to the environmental turn in International Relations Theory and to the new epistemological challenges related to the paradigm shift induced by the new planetary condition of the Anthropocene and the relevant questions arising for a justice encompassing the humanity-earth system. The Encyclical seems to suggest that practicing sustainable international relations means exiting the logic of power or hegemony, while simultaneously operationalizing the concept of care
Biology · Economic Justice · Encyclical · Environmental ethics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Christian Theology and Mission · Law · Philosophy · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics · Religion, Society, and Development
Heuristic or analytical pathway? A multimodal analysis of communicative features in Southern Italian Renewable Energy Communities (RECs)
Religiosity, Political Affiliations, and Environmental Stances in the United States
Religion and ecolinguistics
International politics as global politics from below
How social movements use religious creativity to address environmental crises in Indonesian local communities
The Guardians’ Guards
The power politics of the Holy See
Climate Change and International Relations (After Kyoto)
Radical ecology
Discord and Collaboration
The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy
An Introduction to International Relations
The Oxford Handbook of International Relations
The Routledge Companion to the Study of Religion
The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism
Religion and the Environment
From International to World Society
Climate Change Governance after Bali
Accountability of Networked Climate Governance
The harm principle and global ethics
The Politics of the Anthropocene
Thick Cosmopolitanism
The emergence of environmental stewardship as a primary institution of global international society
Security in the anthropocene
Political Theory on Climate Change
Climate change, human security and violent conflict
The Pope and the environment
| Citations per year | 1.17 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |