Porphyry on Asclepius's and the Gods' Departure from Rome

Bibliographic Data

ID3592401
AuthorsJohn Granger Cook (0000-0002-4874-6368, LaGrange College, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume16
Issue6
Pages755
Publication date2025-06-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReligions (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/rel16060755
OpenAlexW4411210654
LanguageEN
References cited21

Eusebius transmits a fragment of Porphyry's Contra Christianos in which the philosopher claimed that a disease or plague (νόσος) had seized the city for many years because there was no longer any sojourn (ἐπιδημία) of Asclepius and the gods there. Since Jesus was honored, no one experienced any public help from the gods. Porphyry's claim that Asclepius and the gods no longer dwelt in Rome resembles one of the elements of the ancient Roman ritual of evocatio, in which the tutelary deities were called out of a city by a Roman commander. It is only an analogy, since the Christians did not promise the tutelary deities that their images would be carried to their own city and given a cult, and they certainly did not make use of an obscure Roman military ceremony. Whether or not the ritual was practiced in the Imperium is not the central question of this article. Instead I wish to show that the implicit debate between Eusebius and Porphyry alludes to similar arguments between pagans and Christians in antiquity and that there are important analogies between Porphyry's argument about the departure of Rome's tutelary gods due to the presence of worship of the Christian deity in the city and the ritual of evocatio

Ancient history · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Geology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access