A Comparison of the Effects of Augmented Reality N-Back Training and Traditional Two-Dimensional N-Back Training on Working Memory

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3593757
AutoresBo Zhang (0000-0003-0986-0018, East China Normal University, autor de correspondencia), Nigel Robb (0000-0001-7045-0355, Tokyo University of the Arts)
Año2021
Volumen11
Número2
Fecha de publicación2021-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSAGE Open (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/21582440211014507
OpenAlexW3162896386
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas51

We compared two versions of an n-back training program, differing from the graphical perspective, on the effects of working memory (WM) training and transfer. Sixty participants were trained on a traditional n-back task (2D perspective) or an augmented reality (AR) version of the same program. The AR version was rated more engaging and graphically stimulating. Pre- and post-performance on a 2D spatial working memory (SWM) test showed that while both groups improved, the distributions of improvement differed significantly between the groups; the group using traditional training showed generally more improvement on the easier levels of the SWM test. These results may be explained by the fact that the traditional (2D) version of the n-back training was more similar than the AR version to the SWM outcome measure (in virtue of its 2D presentation). This may support the common demands theory of training transfer, which claims that shared demands between training and transfer tasks accounts for near-transfer improvements

Cognition · Cognitive psychology · n-back · Transfer of learning · Transfer of training · Working memory · Working memory training · Cognitive Abilities and Testing · Cognitive Science and Mapping · Computer Science · Engineering · Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence