Words and Pictures
Rāmāyaṇa Traditions and the Art of Ekphrasis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3597177 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Subhashini Kaligotla (Yale University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 364 |
| Publication date | 2020-07-17 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel11070364 |
| OpenAlex | W3043224750 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 5 |
This article examines two ambitious enactments of the Rama story or Rāmāyaṇa, side by side: the 17th-century painted Mewar Rāmāyaṇa and Vālmīki's epic poem (ca. 750-500 BCE). Through a formal analysis of two crucial episodes of the tale, it highlights the creative tactics of each medium and stresses their separate aesthetic interests and autonomy. While A. K. Ramanujan's notion of the "telling" has been immensely influential in South Asian studies to theorize the Rāmāyaṇa's multiplicity, that concept tends to privilege speech-based embodiments. I propose, by contrast, that ekphrasis may be a more broadly applicable lens. Understanding ekphrasis as an enactment of the Rama story in any medium or in interart media, I advocate for considering poetry and painting on an equal plane as opposed to the standard view of the Mewar paintings as visual translations of linguistic phenomena. Ekphrasis, as a gateway to the maker's creative process and preoccupations, is central to the paper's argument, as is the role receivers play in the act of Rāmāyaṇa making
Aesthetics · Art · Art history · Autonomy · EPIC · Literature · Painting · Poetry · Sociology · Vulgarity · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Law · Multisensory perception and integration · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |