The Viceroys are Disappearing from the Roundabouts in Delhi
British symbols of power in post-colonial India
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3606931 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul M Mcgarr (0000-0002-0684-7611, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 787-831 |
| Publication date | 2015-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Modern Asian Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0026-749X • E-ISSN: 1469-8099 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0026749x14000080 |
| OpenAlex | W2164061596 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
| References cited | 22 |
In the aftermath of the Second World War, as post-colonial regimes in Africa and Asia hauled down imperial iconography, to the surprise and approval of many Western observers, India evidenced little interest in sweeping away remnants of its colonial heritage. From the late 1950s onwards, however, calls for the removal of British imperial statuary from India's public spaces came to represent an increasingly important component in a broader dialogue between central and state governments, political parties, the media, and the wider public on the legacy of British colonialism in the subcontinent. This article examines the responses of the ruling Congress Party and the British government, between 1947 and 1970, to escalating pressure from within India to replace British statuary with monuments celebrating Indian nationalism. In doing so, it highlights the significant scope that existed for non-state actors in India and the United Kingdom with a stake in the cultural politics of decolonization to disrupt the smooth running of bilateral relations, and, in Britain's case, to undermine increasingly tenuous claims of continued global relevance. Post-war British governments believed that the United Kingdom's relationship with India could be leveraged, at least in part, to offset the nation's waning international prestige. In fact, as the fate of British statuary in India makes clear, this proved to be at least as problematic and flawed a strategy in the two decades after 1947 as it had been in those before
Ancient history · British Empire · Colonialism · Decolonization · Economic history · Nationalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Prestige · Sociology · State (computer science · Australian History and Society · Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies · History · Law · World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
A Tale of Two Statues
Uncomfortable heritage in the postcolonial city
British soft power in Asia
Citizens and the City
Local Empire
The Art of Memory
The design-politics of decolonization
Identity Matters
In trust for the three nations’ ? The India Office Library & Records dispute, 1947–72
Mountbatten and India, 1964-79
Taj of the Raj
Stabilizing History through Statues, Monuments, and Memorials in Curzon's India
Heroes and Victims in Divided Nationalism
Decolonisation without decoloniality
Boundaries of Belonging
Ambassador’s Report, by Chester Bowles
Memory and the Impact of Political Transformation in Public Space
Colonial Architecture and Urbanism in Africa
A British Empire for the twentieth century
Indian Summer
The Sacred Past
The White House Years
Bread and the Ballot
The "China Problem" Reconsidered
Indira
Vestiges of the Colonial Empire in France
Cemeteries, Public Memory and Raj Nostalgia in Postcolonial Britain and India
Imagined communities
The Empire Strikes Back
Angel of Empire
Learning the use of symbolic means
Gandhiji on the Central Vista
Nehru and the British
Indian Summer. Lutyens, Baker and Imperial Delhi
Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism
Symbols of Power
| Unique citing works | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,14 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 15 |