Neo-leftists versus neo-liberals
PRC intellectual debates in the 1990s
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3612552 |
|---|---|
| Authors | A B Kipnis (0000-0003-4509-4103, Australian National University, corresponding author), Andrew Kipnis |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 239-251 |
| Publication date | 2003-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Intercultural Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0725-6868 • E-ISSN: 1469-9540 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0725686032000172588 |
| OpenAlex | W2092243199 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
This paper examines the contemporary debates among 'neo-leftist' and 'neo- liberal' Chinese intellectuals as a means of discussing strategies for intellectual criticism in a post-socialist world. While sympathetic towards the neo-leftist critique of neo-liberal views on markets, I argue that the neo-leftist refusal to reflect on the shortcomings of the Cultural Revolution leads to an unfortunate reproduction of Maoist rhetorical strategies in their writings. After examining some of these rhetorical strategies, I conclude by suggesting that a deconstruction of the category of liberalism itself offers greater promise for contemporary intellectual criticism
Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Communism, Protests, Social Movements · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · Gender Studies · Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,06 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2009 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |