Only Religions Count in Vietnam

Thich Tri Quang has long been one of the most controversial actors in the history of the Vietnam War. Scholars on the right have argued that Tri Quang was in all likelihood a communist agent operating at the behest of Hanoi. Scholars on the left have argued that Tri Quang was a peaceful religious leader devoted to democracy and a rapid end to the war. This article argues that neither of these interpretations is persuasive. As American officials rightly concluded throughout the war, there was no compelling evidence to suggest that Tri Quang was a communist agent or in any way sympathetic to the goals of Hanoi or the NLF. Drawing on the extensive archival evidence of Tri Quang's conversations with American officials, it is apparent that Tri Quang was in fact strongly anti-communist and quite receptive to the use of American military power against North Vietnam and China. The main factor that led to conflict between the Buddhist movement and the Johnson administration was Tri Quang's insistence that the military regimes that followed Ngo Dinh Diem were hostile to Buddhism and incapable of leading the struggle against Communism to a successful conclusion

Administration (probate law · Buddhism · China · Communism · Democracy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Theology · Vietnam War · Chinese history and philosophy · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · Law · Philosophy · Public Administration · Religious studies · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies · Religious Studies

• Religious Revival and the Politics of Nation Building

  Open Access•Edward Miller•Modern Asian Studies•2015

  Add to list

• "Peoples Quite Apart"

  George C Herring•Diplomatic History•1990

  Add to list

• Intervention

  Timothy J Lomperis, George Mct Kahin•Journal of American History•1987

  Add to list

• Political Monks

  Open Access•Mark Moyar•Modern Asian Studies•2004

  Add to list