Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Why Dragons Are Bisexual

Bibliographic Data

ID3620683
AuthorsRobert Blust (corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume114
Issue1
Pages169-180
Publication date2019-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnthropos (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0257-9774
PublisherNomos Verlag (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5771/0257-9774-2019-1-169
OpenAlexW2948611467
LanguageEN

Dragons are portrayed in widely separated cultures as simultaneously male and female. While this trait may appear arbitrary, its global distribution implies that it is motivated by observations available to all humans. Many seemingly arbitrary traits of dragons are shared by conceptions of the rainbow, which is widely portrayed as having both male (primary) and female (secondary) arcs. This correlation of features in mythical and natural counterparts shows that the nineteenth-century doctrine of naturalism, which saw various elements of myth and folklore as reflecting features of the natural world, was valid despite excesses that eventually caused its abandonment

Archaeology · Art · Doctrine · Epistemology · Ethnology · Folklore · Literature · Mythology · Naturalism · Political science · Theology · Trait · Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies · History · Law · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae