Surrogacy
Time We Recognized It as a Job
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3630374 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sylvie Armstrong (0000-0002-9419-8518, European University Institute, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 864-867 |
| Publication date | 2021-10-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Gender Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0958-9236 • E-ISSN: 1465-3869 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09589236.2021.1915754 |
| OpenAlex | W3152710943 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 10 |
Though commercial surrogates are paid for providing a service, there is systemic reluctance to characterize these arrangements as ‘work’. No jurisdiction in the world currently uses a labour law model to regulate this practice. Perhaps more significantly, research has found that industry narratives in popular commercial destinations including Georgia, California, and (formerly) India are constructed around expectations of altruism, which distance surrogates from their identity as workers even when paid. This contribution explores one aspect of this: the practical concern that normalizing contract pregnancy will cause it to become a mainstream solution to unemployment. It is argued that this assumption is a further manifestation of the ‘devaluation thesis’ already experienced by reproductive labourers. Once unpicked, it becomes apparent that surrogacy is not a role that can be successfully performed by anyone with a uterus. With proper screening, this concern could be managed
Business · Currency · Devaluation · Economic growth · Economics · Jurisdiction · Labour economics · Mainstream · Political science · Seekers · Sociology · Unemployment · Child Welfare and Adoption · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Law · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 1.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |