Poor Queer Studies

Class, Race, and the Field

Bibliographic Data

ID3630928
AuthorsMatt Brim (0000-0002-6497-8484, English Department, College of Staten Island, City University of New York (CUNY), Staten Island, New York, USA, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume67
Issue3
Pages398-416
Publication date2020-02-23
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Homosexuality (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0091-8369 • E-ISSN: 1540-3602
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00918369.2018.1534410
PMID30403565
OpenAlexW2900264299
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited22

This study asks, What are the material conditions under which queer studies is done in the academy? It finds a longstanding association of queer studies with the well-resourced, selective colleges and flagship campuses that are the drivers of class and race stratification in higher education in the U.S. That is, the field of queer studies, as a recognizable academic formation, has been structured by the material and intellectual resources of precisely those institutions that most steadfastly refuse to adequately serve poor and minority students, including poor and minority queer students. In response, "poor queer studies" calls for a critical reorientation of queer studies toward working-poor schools, students, theories, and pedagogies. Taking the College of Staten Island, CUNY as a case study, it argues for structural crossing over or "queer-class ferrying" between high-status institutions that have so brilliantly dominated queer studies' history and low-status worksites of poor queer studies

Class (philosophy · Queer · Queer theory · Race (biology · Sociology · Academic Freedom and Politics · Feminist Theory and Gender Studies · Gender Studies · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub