Magic, Modernity, and Orientalism

Conjuring representations of Asia

Bibliographic Data

ID3636245
AuthorsChristopher Goto-Jones (Leiden University, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume48
Issue6
Pages1451-1476
Publication date2014-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueModern Asian Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0026-749X • E-ISSN: 1469-8099
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0026749x13000498
OpenAlexW2129611860
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited17

This article inquires into the cultural and political nexus of secular (stage) magic, modernity, and Orientalism at the turn of the twentieth century. It argues that these three arenas interacted in important and special ways to both shape and reflect the politics of knowledge of the period. In doing so, it draws attention to the ways in which secular magic has been overlooked as a historical phenomenon and highlights its utility in furthering our understanding of the great problematics of modernity and Orientalism; in particular, it suggests that magic actually provides an unusually vibrant and clear lens through which to view the politics of the Other and through which to explore issues of tradition and the modern.Focusing on two historical cases-the 'Indian Rope Trick' challenge issued by the Magic Circle in the 1930s and the astonishing 'duel' between the 'Chinese' magicians Chung Ling Soo and Ching Ling Foo in 1905-this article considers the ways in which discourses of origination, popular ideas about esotericism and the 'mystic East', and questions of technical competence interacted and competed in the culture politics of the early twentieth century

Aesthetics · Art · Epistemology · Literature · MAGIC (telescope · Modernity · Orientalism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies · History · Japanese History and Culture · Law · Philosophy · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices