Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Oraons of Chhotanagpur

A journey through colonial ethnography

Bibliographic Data

ID3637242
AuthorsSangeeta Dasgupta (0000-0002-3705-6409, Jawaharlal Nehru University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume56
Issue5
Pages1375-1415
Publication date2022-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueModern Asian Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0026-749X • E-ISSN: 1469-8099
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0026749x21000597
OpenAlexW4301373588
LanguageEN
References cited1

This article explores nineteenth-century colonial representations of the Oraons of Chhotanagpur. Described in administrative reports of early nineteenth-century Chhotanagpur as mlecchha and dhangar, or as part of a 'village community' of Coles/Kols, these Oraons, by the late nineteenth century, were referred to as a 'tribe'. To trace the categories through which the Oraons journeyed across colonial records, I discuss texts and reports which later became part of bureaucratic memory. The shifts within official understanding, I argue, were related to the working of official minds, changing assumptions, and differing languages; the tensions within the discipline of anthropology and its application in the colony; the variations within ideologies of governance and the imperatives of rule; and interactions with 'native' informants and correspondents, along with personal observations of local practices. There remained, however, an uneasy tension between wider intellectual trends in Europe and their reverberations in the colony, and the experiences of governance: colonial knowledge was not always produced with arrogance and assurance but also with doses of uncertainty, hesitation, disquiet, and often despair. In the shifting representations of the tribe across the nineteenth century, there is, I suggest, a pattern. In the pre-1850s, local nomenclature was adopted and voices of dissent-expressed through agrarian protests in Chhotanagpur-were addressed. By the 1850s, the utilitarian agenda structured colonial imaginaries and interventions. The 1860s witnessed the interplay of ethnological concerns, missionary beliefs, and Arcadian principles. From the 1890s, the idea of tribe was overwhelmingly structured by the supremacy of disciplinary knowledge systems that increasingly supplanted the role of the 'native' informant

Bureaucracy · Colonialism · Discipline · Dissent · Ethnography · Ideology · Indirect rule · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Tribe · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Anthropology · History · Law · South Asian Studies and Conflicts · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies

  • Heathen aboriginals', 'Christian tribes', and 'animistic races

    Open Access•Sangeeta Dasgupta•Modern Asian Studies•2016

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae