Der Nashornspur folgen, wo es kein Nashorn mehr gibt
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3639802 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tilman Musch (0000-0002-4851-7151, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 114 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 145-156 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Anthropos (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0257-9774 |
| Publisher | Nomos Verlag (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5771/0257-9774-2019-1-145 |
| OpenAlex | W2948527573 |
| Language | EN |
Manifold spoors of human presence can be found in the Central Sahara - from prehistoric remains to contemporary tracks of men or animals. These objects constitute timescapes where locals - the Teda - are "tracking in time." The article describes how such timescapes are constituted and how tracking takes places here. Following the Liebenberg-Carruthers-debate, the author asks whether or not "tracking in time" can be considered as science and links the results to a wider discussion about new (local) approaches to African anthropology, history, and archaeology
Archaeology · Ethnology · Humanities · Prehistory · Sociology · Anthropology · China's Global Influence and Migration · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Global Maritime and Colonial Histories · History · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |