Who is entitled to feel in the age of populism? Women's resistance to migrant detention in Britain
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3672201 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ali Bilgic (0000-0002-5593-894X), Athina Gkouti |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 97 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 483-502 |
| Publication date | 2021-03-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ia/iiaa054 |
| OpenAlex | W3005227124 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 12 |
European states have adopted strict migration policies, such as unlimited detention in Britain, to address increasing anti-immigrant emotions in the context of rising anti-immigrant populism. These state practices prioritize the feelings of insecurity of some population groups towards immigrants whose emotions and insecurities are politically marginalized. Consequently, whose emotions matter in politics intertwines with whose security matters. This article articulates emotions in politics of security as an entitlement, which feed into the question of who 'merits' security politically. By focusing on individuals to whom such entitlement is denied in the context of anti-immigrant populism, it investigates how immigrant women 'feel' detention and enact their emotions in their own everyday 'felt' security. The research is conducted through in-depth interviews with women who experienced detention in Britain. Through the method of 'listening guide' adapted from psychology, the research studies their narratives about their emotions before, during and after detention. By bringing together the feminist research on emotions and 'everyday security' approaches in International Relations, this analysis contributes to feminist IR and security studies on women's agency in the politics of security, by revealing the importance of emotional dynamics in their everyday 'felt' security practices. Therefore, it offers a path for feminist IR and security studies to prioritize those whom anti-immigrant populism aims to silence in the age of populism
Context (archaeology) · Entitlement (fair division) · Immigration · Immigration detention · Political science · Politics · Populism · Refugee · Sociology · Employment and Welfare Studies · Gender Studies · Law · Migration, Health and Trauma · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Migrant and refugee activists as security agents
Legal Arguments Against Emotions – How the Law Silences Militant Disillusionment Within the Identity Evolution of a Nonreligious Organisation
Women and the War on Drugs
The limits of strategic narratives
Tendencias léxicas, emocionales y temáticas de los debates presidenciales. Casos México, Estados Unidos y Ecuador
Emotions in Politics
The Politics of Emotions in International Relations
Towards an intersectional approach to populism
Queering ontological (in)security
Security for Whom and How? Migrants' Felt and Embodied (In)Securityscape on the Atlantic Route
The Politics of Fear and Hate
The Politics of Fear
Affective Communities in World Politics
What authoritarianism is … and is not
The Effects of Right-Wing Populist Communication on Emotions and Cognitions toward Immigrants
Why Immigration Detention is Unique
Feeling Everyday IR
Is extreme right‐wing populism contagious? Explaining the emergence of a new party family
Subjectivity and identity in detention
The Irregular Migrant as Homo Sacer
Attachment, tautology, and ontological security
Bordering solidarities
Affecting feminism
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |