What do we talk about when we talk about the 'return' of geopolitics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3693455 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Carsten Nickel (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 100 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 221-239 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-08 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ia/iiad295 |
| OpenAlex | W4390663613 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
Western public and academic debates stipulate a 'return' of geopolitics, but confusion reigns over its substantial meaning. Recent scholarship has increasingly equated the term with the imperialist context in which 'classical' geopolitics first emerged, unmasking its spatial determinism but also losing sight of its geographic dimension. Today, geopolitics vaguely combines notions of systemic power competition in a neo-realist sense with constructivist ideas about spatially expansive authoritarianism. To address the resulting confusion, the article conducts interpretive process tracing and analyses how, throughout the twentieth century, classical geopolitics spatially substantiated systemic dynamics of shifting international power balances and broader political programmes such as imperialism, especially via competition on and over the Eurasian landmass. The article examines how, amid renewed competition with Russia and China over Eurasia-as well as doubts over the leanings of European and Asian middle powers in this contest-these traditional concerns reverberate even in contemporary western geopolitical debates characterized by vaguer definitions. This approach helps differentiate geopolitics from standard theories of International Relations and highlights how our unease with spatial arguments under liberal universalism drives today's largely metaphorical use of the term. American Cold War geopolitics, leveraged in defence of domestic democracy, emerges as a thought-provoking contrast
Context (archaeology) · Geopolitics · International relations · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Scholarship · Sociology · History · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US
Geocultural Power in the Red Sea Region
Taking the EU Seriously
Mundane Geopolitics, Strategic (De)Coupling, and Chinese Infrastructure Investment in Europe
Geopolitics
The “Lebensraum” Reconsidered
From geopolitics to geoeconomics and back. Why age of geoeconomics is over
A certain idea of space
Twenty years of vernacular security research
Green Windows or Old Traps? Geopoliticization, Extractivism, and Policy Challenges in the Global South
Geopolitical Imaginations and Global Histories of International Thought
Re-Configuring the Sahel
International relations and the revolutionary geopolitics of the European New Right
From transformation to demarcation
The geopolitics of history
The City as a Geopolitical Actor
| Citations per year | 7.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |