The futility of the pandemic treaty
Caught Between Globalism and Statism
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3700858 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Clare Wenham (0000-0001-5378-3203), Mark Eccleston-Turner (0000-0002-2589-0738), Maike Vo, Maike Voss (0000-0002-7534-6722) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 98 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 837-852 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-05-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ia/iiac023 |
| OpenAlex | W4220873419 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 22 |
| Referencias citadas | 2 |
In November 2021, the World Health Assembly (WHA) is hosting a special session to discuss the proposed plans for a pandemic treaty. Despite the fact that there are scant details concerning the treaty, the proposal has gained considerable support in both the academic community, and at the international level. While we agree that in the wake of the numerous governance failures during COVID-19, we need to develop appropriate global solutions to be able to prevent, detect, respond to, and recover from future global health crises-and that such mechanisms should be rooted in global equity-we disagree, however, that this pandemic treaty, currently, is the most appropriate way in which to achieve this. Indeed, notions of global community, solidarity, fairness are far removed from the reality that we have seen unfolding in the actions of states responding to the pandemic. This is the crux of the tension with the proposed treaty: the balance between the ideal cosmopolitan worldview held by those in power in global health, and the practice of national security decision-making witnessed in the last 18 months. Indeed, we do not believe that a pandemic treaty will deliver what is being extolled by its proponents, and it will not solve the multiple problems of global cooperation in global health that supporters believe it will
Global health · Globalism · Health care · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Sociology · Solidarity · Treaty · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Global Security and Public Health · Health and Conflict Studies · Law
Understanding the expectations, positions and ambitions of LMICs during pandemic treaty negotiations, and the factors contributing to them
National Identities in Global Health
Expert knowledge for global pandemic policy
Strategizing global health governance
China and the WHO pandemic treaty
Is the proposed global treaty an answer for public health emergencies
The Pandemic Treaty, the Pandemic Fund, and the Global Commons
International negotiations for a pandemic treaty
The WHO Pandemic Agreement Negotiation
Diffusion by Leadership
Fit for Purpose?” Assessing the Ecological Fit of the Social Institutions that Globally Govern Antimicrobial Resistance
Covid-19 vaccine apartheid and the failure of global cooperation
Rights redux
Building reparative futures demands a reckoning with the crisis form of global health
Strategic solidarity
The biomedical securitization of global health
When one size does not fit all – New Zealand perspectives on the International Health Regulations during the Covid-19 pandemic
The show must go on
Issue framing, political identities, and public support for multilateral vaccine cooperation during Covid‐19
From Imperialism to the “Golden Age” to the Great Lockdown
A captura ideológica dos mecanismos de participação social da OMS na negociação do acordo internacional sobre pandemias
The ideological capture of WHO's social participation mechanisms in the negotiation of the international pandemic agreement
| Obras citantes distintas | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 7,33 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 21 |