When the hegemon goes rogue
Leadership amid the US assault on the liberal trading order
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3707113 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kristen Hopewell (0000-0002-4074-2629, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 97 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1025-1043 |
| Publication date | 2021-07-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ia/iiab073 |
| OpenAlex | W3169934854 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
Under President Trump, the United States abdicated its traditional leadership role in the trading system, abandoning multilateralism for aggressive unilateralism and launching an active assault on the World Trade Organization (WTO). Most strikingly, the US blocked appointments to the Appellate Body, jeopardizing the WTO's dispute settlement mechanism. With the trade regime in crisis, a key question has been whether other states would have the will and capacity to lead system-preserving initiatives. While most attention has focused on whether China-widely seen as the chief hegemonic challenger to the US-would assume the mantle of leadership, there has been considerable scepticism about the European Union's capacity to exercise leadership amid the crisis. The EU has generally been seen as punching below its weight in terms of leadership at the WTO. In this article, however, I argue that it is the EU, rather than China, that has taken the lead in advancing concrete initiatives directed at defending and maintaining the multilateral trading system. The EU led the creation of an interim appeals arrangement to replace the defunct Appellate Body-in effect, creating an 'Appellate Body minus the US'. Although the rules-based multilateral trading system remains under threat, it is the EU, not China, that is acting as a system-preserving power, leading efforts to defend the established order
Bilateralism · China · Economics · Hegemony · International trade · Law and economics · Multilateralism · Order (exchange) · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Unilateralism · Finance · Law · World Trade Organization Law
Second Attempt at America First
Disentangling institutional contestation by established powers
Methods of economic statecraft
The greenback’s double bind
The (surprise) return of development policy space in the multilateral trading system
Donald Trump and the survival strategies of international organisations
Between Scylla and Charybdis
Geoeconomic rivalry in Central Asia
IO survival politics
The show must go on
The Illusion of the China-US-Europe Strategic Triangle
A partial conversion
The geopolitical economy of the original condition
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |